Comparison of ELISA using recombinant LipL32 and sonicated antigen of leptospira for detecting bovine leptospirosis.

Leptospirosis is one of the most widely distributed zoonosis in the world. Bovine leptospirosis is a serious problem in bovine production, causing reproductive losses. The aim of this work was to compare recombinant LipL32 with sonicated antigen for detecting anti-Leptospira IgG antibodies in bovine serum using ELISA. The Microscopic Agglutination Test (MAT) is used as the gold standard. Sonicated antigen from cultures of Leptospira interrogans serogroup Icterohaemorrhagiae serovar copenhageni (strain M20) was used for the eELISA and rLipL32 for the rELISA. The performance of these assays was evaluated using serum samples from 166 bovines, 69 MAT positive and 97 MAT negative. At the optimal cut-off point recommended by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, the sensitivity and specificity values were 98.6% and 97.9%, respectively, for eELISA, and 85.5% and 86.6% respectively, for rELISA. The value for the area under the ROC curve was 0.998 (0.994-1.0) (CI 95%) for eELISA and 0.929 (0.891-0.968) (CI 95%) for rELISA. The ROC curves for rLipL32 and sonicated antigen showed statistically significant differences (z = -3.826; p = 0.000). A three-way comparison showed statistically significant differences in the sensitivity and specificity of rELISA and eELISA. Our results showed that eELISA was more specific and sensitive than rELISA. The difference in performance (eELISA-rELISA) was 13.4% (4.03-23.28) (CI 95%) for sensitivity and 11.34 % (4.07-19.56) (CI 95%) for specificity. Our results show that the eELISA has a better diagnostic performance than rELISA for the detection of anti-Leptospira IgG antibodies in bovine serum.

Detección de Leptospira spp. (Spirochaetales: Leptospiraceae) en muestras ambientales de regiones habitadas por poblaciones vulnerables del norte argentino / Leptospira spp. (Spirochaetales: Leptospiraceae) detection in environmental samples from geographical regions inhabited by vulnerable communities in northern Argentina

Resumen La leptospirosis continúa siendo hoy en día un problema para la salud pública, principalmente en poblaciones de bajos recursos socioeconómicos. En este trabajo se presenta la detección de leptospiras patógenas en muestras ambientales (aguas y barros) provenientes de regiones del norte argentino (provincias de Formosa, Salta, Santiago del Estero, Misiones y Chaco) con variadas características climatológicas habitadas por poblaciones vulnerables. De las 89 muestras analizadas, en el 24,7% fue posible detectar molecularmente la presencia de leptospiras patógenas. La prevalencia por tipo de muestra fue de 27,8% para las aguas y 11,8% para los barros. Todas las localidades muestreadas presentaron al menos una muestra positiva a alguna de las pruebas realizadas, por lo que el presente trabajo refleja la necesidad de profundizar los estudios de la leptospirosis en distintas regiones de la Argentina.

Abstract Leptospirosis remains as a major public health problem nowadays, mainly affecting vulnerable communities with low socioeconomic resources. In this study, the molecular detection of pathogenic leptospires from environmental samples (water and mud) from northern Argentina (Formosa, Salta, Santiago del Estero, Misiones and Chaco provinces) is described. Samples were obtained from regions with varied climatological features, all inhabited by vulnerable communities. From the 89 samples that were analyzed, 24.7% showed molecular evidence of the presence of pathogenic leptospires. Prevalence by sample type was: 27.8% in water samples and 11.8% in mud samples. All the sampled regions showed at least one positive sample. This result highlights the need of further research regarding leptospirosis in different regions of Argentina.

Use of Chelex-100 for the molecular diagnosis of five animal pathogens / Uso de Chelex-100 para el diagnóstico molecular de cinco patógenos de animales

Abstract Molecular tools have improved conventional veterinary diagnosis. Acid nucleic extraction is a key step for downstream applications. This work aimed to compare the DNA extraction method Chelex-100 resin (M1) with Whatman® cards (M2), phenol-chloroform (M3), or commercial kits (M4), and to determine the most sensitive and inexpensive one for its diagnosis of animal pathogens that, despite their economic or zoonotic relevance, receive little attention. DNA was isolated from urine, organs, semen, blood and intestinal mucous, from the bacteria Leptospira interrogans serovar Pomona Pomona (by M1 and M2), Brucella melitensis (by M1, M3 and M4), and Salmonella ser. Abortusequi (by M1 and M4), and the parasites Leishmania spp. (by M1, M3 and M4), and Eimeria spp. (by M1 and M3), respectively. The sensitivity of each method was assayed by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR). The M1 showed similar sensitivity for Salmonella ser. Abortusequi, Leishmania spp., and Eimeria spp., being better for L. interrogans serovar Pomona Pomona and slightly lower for B. melitensis. For the first time, a simple and economic method was successfully employed for extracting DNA from these animal pathogens, especially important in low-resource settings, contributing to the diagnosis of leptospirosis, brucellosis, leishmaniasis, and coccidiosis; as well as to the molecular epidemiology of salmonellosis in stallion from semen samples.

Resumen Las técnicas moleculares han contribuido a mejorar el diagnóstico veterinario tradicional y la extracción de ácidos nucleicos es determinante. El objetivo de este trabajo fue comparar el método de extracción de ADN Chelex-100 (M1) con papel Whatman (M2), fenol-cloroformo (M3) o kits comerciales (M4), y determinar un método sensible y de bajo costo para el diagnóstico de patógenos de animales económica o zoonóticamente relevantes y que reciben poca atención. A partir de orina, órganos, semen, sangre y mucosa intestinal se extrajo el ADN de las bacterias Leptospira interrogans serovar Pomona Pomona (con M1 y M2), Brucella melitensis (con M1, M3 y M4), Salmonella ser. Abortusequi (M1 y M4), y de los parásitos Leishmania spp. (M1, M3 y M4) y Eimeria spp. (M1 y M3), respectivamente. La sensibilidad de los protocolos fue analizada por PCR. El método M1 demostró una sensibilidad similar para S. Abortusequi, Leishmania spp. y Eimeria spp., siendo mejor para L. interrogans y levemente menor para B. melitensis. Por primera vez se usó exitosamente en estos patógenos veterinarios un método simple y económico para extraer ADN, especialmente importante en laboratorios de bajos recursos económicos, contribuyendo al diagnóstico de leptospirosis, brucelosis, leishmaniasis y coccidiosis, así como también a la epidemiología molecular de salmonelosis en muestras de semen de caballos.

Comparación de métodos de extracción de ADN simples y económicos para el diagnóstico molecular de leptospirosis animal

La leptospirosis bovina es una importante enfermedad zoonótica cuyo diagnóstico molecular está ampliamente divulgado. Sin embargo, no existe un método único de extracción de ADN para leptospiras patógenas a partir de muestras clínicas. En este trabajo se utilizó orina bovina contaminada con cultivo de L. interrogans serovar Pomona Pomona para analizar el mejor método comparando: M1.) resina Chelex-100, M2.) papel FTA Whatman y M3.) hervido de la muestra (protocolo casero). De estas tres técnicas, la primera (M1) presentó la mayor sensibilidad al realizar la PCR de diagnóstico, detectándose hasta 2x102 leptospiras/mL. La metodología aquí planteada resultó tener buen rendimiento para la detección de leptospiras en muestras clínicas animales, aunque es necesario su validación con mayor número y diversidad de muestras.

Bovine leptospirosis is an important zoonotic disease whose molecular diagnosis is widely reported. However, there is not a unique method of extraction of DNA for pathogenic leptospires using clinical samples. In this study, bovine urine was contaminated with pure culture of L. interrogans serovar Pomona Pomona in order to compare three of them: M1.) Chelex-100 resin, M2.) FTA Whatman paper and M3.) boiling of the sample (in-house protocol), being the first one the most sensitive when used in diagnostic PCR, detecting up to 2x102 leptospiras/mL. The methodology proposed in this study turned out to have good performance for the detection of leptospires in animal clinical samples, although it should be applied to a greater number of samples and in different stages of the pathology.